This book has grown out of an attempt to harmonize two different tendencies, one in psychology, the other in physics, with both of which I find myself in sympathy, although at first sight they might seem inconsistent. On the one hand, many psychologists, especially those of the behaviourist school, tend to adopt what is essentially a materialistic position, as a matter of method if not of metaphysics. They make psychology increasingly dependent on physiology and external observation, and tend to think of matter as something much more solid and indubitable than mind. Meanwhile the physicists, especially Einstein and other exponents of the theory of relativity, have been making "matter" less and less material. Their world consists of "events," from which "matter" is derived by a logical construction. I think that what has permanent value in the outlook of the behaviourists is the feeling that physics is the most fundamental science at present in existence. But this position cannot be called materialistic, if, as seems to be the case, physics does not assume the existence of matter.
Idioma: INGLÉS

RIGUROSO

Riguroso

Determina lo preciso o impreciso que es este libro con respecto a lo que se cuenta en el mismo. 0 significa que es completamente impreciso y 10 que cuenta es rigurosamente verídico

DIVERTIDO

Divertido

Determina lo divertido que te ha resultado el libro: 0-aburrido 10-muy divertido

COMPLEJO

Complejo

Determinamos lo complejo que nos ha resultado la lectura del libro. Desde el nivel más bajo, que indica que es un texto secillo de comprender hasta el valor máximo que indica que es complejo de comprender

SORPRENDE

Sorprende

Indica lo sorprendente que resulta el argumento del libro, desde 0: previsible hasta 10: totalmente desconcertante y sorprendente

Entra en BiblioEteca...

THE ANALYSIS OF THE MIND

Sinópsis del libro:

Comentarios de los lectores

Yo Leo

Anillo de blogs

Paga si te gusta

BiblioEtecarios

Yo Escribo

Ayuda

AVISO DE COOKIES